Kids Say the Darndest Things :)

as0003tn.gif A few of my new favorite teaching stories (mine and others’):

- A child approaches the teacher bawling at the top of her lungs. “What’s wrong?” asks the teacher in horror. Through her sobs, the child replies, “Jill and Sally won’t let me cheat off them!”

-Right before a science test, a student marches up to the teacher and informs her that he “doesn’t feel like taking it,” for all the world as though he expects her to do something about it.

-Out of nowhere, a fourth grade student heavily sighs and announces, “Life is meaningless and empty.” A moment later, though, he tells his teacher that the problem is solved: he just remembered he’s getting a new DS game today.

-A student, with the best intentions in the world, informs her teacher, “My brother says you’re the meanest teacher in the school, but I think you’re nice.”

A few of my favorite things :)

Cheers
Caryn

Place Holder

WordPress won’t let me upload any pictures, which is putting a crimp in my plans. I’m still alive, though. I just can’t talk about bunnies without a visual aid :(

Brit Sings and Vanier Inspires

oct2807.jpgWell, I’m running behind, but that’s par for the course these days. Stick with me; I’ll be back on track after this weekend! And here’s a very SPECIAL Halos Hallowe’en! :)

The play is going really well — we’ve sold out almost every night, so it’s great fun. There’s nothing quite as discouraging as working your butt off and then performing to a crowd of seven.

In other news, apparently Brittney Spears figures the way to get her career back on-track is to appear on Sesame Street.  I have two serious questions about this:

1. Why, precisely, does she think children are her target audience?

2. Who on earth made this casting call? Is Sesame Street not popular enough; they figure they have to get (and I use the term loosely) “pop stars” to boost the ratings? I don’t know; maybe they felt sorry for the girl. I do. I feel sorry for most celebrities, especially child celebrities. There’s nothing quite as absurd as fame in our current culture — probably because now we have the technology to maintain 24/7 surveillance, which we choose to exercise on famous people instead of pedophiles. But hey. What do I know?

Tomorrow’s Trust linked to a really neat article about Jean Vanier, founder of the L’Arche homes for people with mental and physical disabilities. I particularly liked this quote: “Keep dreaming, …keep hoping and [do] not get caught up in the sickness of our time, depression.” Amen to that. Our time lends itself particularly well to anxieties and unhappiness. It’s nice to see there are still people willing to stand against it without being devoured by cynicism.

Some other nice quotes:

Do something different with your lives, he urged the young people . “We don’t have to be like a bunch of cows or sheep.”

“Terrible loneliness, fear of rejection, inner pain. Perhaps many of you have lived this?”

“You are more beautiful that you dare suspect.”

Cheers,
Caryn

Opening Night!

Well, the trauma of opening night is at an end,and things went well for Arsenic and Old Lace! We had a great time out there and only a few minor mess-ups, most of which had to do with the set (at least as far as I was concerned). We arrived at 5:00 to find them painting the stage floor, which caused me and another actor to have heart palipitations. Fortunately, though, the paint was dry by showtime. We didn’t get to go on stage before the show, though, so a few things were a surprise (such as the table that had magically appeared by the couch, which I nearly tripped over when I ran around it, or the door that suddenly opened out instead of in, which caused me to nearly  yank the entire set down with me the first time I tried to leave).

Generally, though, I’m tired but happy. Good show! And happy to be onstage again.

That’s all for now — more shows today and tomorrow, and I’m pretty wiped. My bunnies are starting to get twitchy about me never being home too, so hopefully they won’t start chewing holes in the bed again (which is how they expressed their displeasure last time I left them alone for too long. Honestly, it’s like having children — ill-tempered, destructive, demanding children).

Cheers!

Caryn

Hmm.

I don’t generally like to call attention to foolish people, but I do feel the need to draw attention to a very silly comment left on my blog recently. It’s too contradictory, pretentious, and just downright amusing to let slide. This is it, and my response:

COMMENT:

You’ve just about proven that religion is all about ego with your rant. It’s refreshing to have people go against the grain and have different views, but unfortunately there will always be people like you who judge them by ridiculous standards based on your outdated holy text. It’s quite unfortunate that you’re missing the essence of his view that religion seems like a petty bargain with a supernatural force. It’s also disparaging to read your opinion that, “He has talent, charm, and wealth; he doesn’t need brains.” Truly truly sad. What you’ve just said totally contradicts the women’s rights and feminist movements. Lisa Simpson would be ashamed of you just like she was with that talking Malibu Stacey doll. You’re just a pompous wanker with a blog.

RESPONSE:

Ah, yes. It’s “refreshing” to have “different views” as long as there aren’t people who have contradictory views based on “oudated holy texts,” is that it? So in other words, it’s refreshing to have different views provided they don’t contradict yours — which is precisely what you’ve accused me of. Intriguing.

And incidentally, my friend, the talent charm and wealth comment is what is called sarcasm, irony, potent exaggeration — there are many terms. I had to read your comment several times to figure out what the heck you were talking about with your “women’s rights and feminist movements.” Not that I care if I contradict them, of course — as a woman I’m very secure in myself and don’t need any particular movement to confirm that. As it happens, I don’t personally find Brad Pitt particularly charming. I can’t deny that he has talent and wealth, though.

It’s sad when people like you miss the point entirely of what a person is saying and then accuse them of doing the same. I haven’t missed Mr. Pitt’s view; I understand exactly what he’s saying. In fact, that’s what I was disgusted with. But it’s okay. As a follower of an “outdated holy text,” I shall live up to its “ridiculous standards” and avoid personal insults and slander — such as you’ve just thrown at me. (By the way, I looked up wanker just to confirm my understanding of its meaning, and I’m really not sure the description applies to me. But obviously that’s the least of our concerns here).

Hmm. Which one of us is all about ego?

Because there weren’t ENOUGH bizarre fanfics about Harry Potter…

dumbledore3img_assist_custom.jpgOoookay, I guess with the last book of Harry Potter finished, J. K. Rowling just couldn’t stand being out of the spotlight for more than an hour at a time.

For those who don’t know yet, apparently Dumbledore is gay. Why? Er, because Rowling said so. What does it have to do with the stories? Well, nothing whatsoever. But it sure makes a stir, doesn’t it? Check it out! Now she’s got MORE controversy from the fundamentalist crowd, which is sure to take this as confirmation of Harry’s evil nature, and she’s stirring up controversy from the uber-liberal crowd too — apparently, Dumbeldore isn’t gay enough.

It’s so absurd. Why does the sexuality of a character in a children’s book even have to come up? OK, let’s be fair — other characters’ sexuality does come up, and the books aren’t exactly for kids by number seven. BUT… do I really care about the sexuality of a hundred year old man one way or another?

Here is my favorite bit from the article I linked to:

 ”There’s been speculation in the kids’ lit community as to why Rowling’s Harry Potter universe didn’t include any gay or lesbian characters,” said Brent Hartinger, author of the children’s fantasy Dreamquest and also various young adult books about gay teens. “Was Rowling just clueless or indifferent about the topic?

Oh my God, I love it. If you don’t include a homosexual character, you’re “clueless and indifferent” now. So if you’re writing a story that doesn’t contain a specific member of every conceivable minority, I guess you’d better run and work one in — otherwise you’re demonstrating how “clueless” and “indifferent” you are to their situation. Hey, I noticed that there weren’t any displaced Australian aborigines in the Harry Potter series. I think we’d better start a series of angry letters!

Of course, the backlash is “why didn’t she include this information in the stories????” Well, why would she? What exactly does the sexual orientation of a man who’s lived over a century have to do with Harry’s struggle against the darkness? I mean, lucky us, we got glimpses of a few other characters’ love lives, but what’s Dudley’s sexual orientation? What’s McGonagall’s?

WHO CARES?

That’s the thing that’s really bugging me: this is so gratuitous. You know, I’m certainly not saying you should never have a homosexual character in a story, movie, etc. There are some stories that simply wouldn’t work without involving aspects of someone’s personality. But in this case, if it were anyone less famous than Rowling, I would call this a publicity-grab. As it is, I can only guess she’s addicted to controversy at this point.

Sigh, so much for my crusade against people who insist on reading too much into Harry Potter. I guess we’ll have nothing but illiterate fourteen year old girls posting weird fanfiction all over the place from now on.

Come to think of it… I guess nothing’s actually changed!

Cheers
Caryn

Back for Real!

OK, so now I’m in one of those situations where I have to get better quicker than I want to… Man! Whatever this was, it sure sucked the life right outta me. I’m leaning towards bronchitis or influenza, but I can’t say for sure as I’m not a doctor, and apparently seeing a doctor is out of the question in this town.

On the bright side, I did watch the entire series of Firefly plus the movie Serenity. I read a completely unsubstantiated internet rumor that they’re discussing a sequel to Serenity based on how the deluxe DVD sells… probably/possibly untrue, but if you haven’t checked Firefly out, now might be a good time to do it! Joss Whedon is always fun, and I tend to think of Buffy and Angel as his shows for teenagers while Firefly is his show for grown-ups.

Just don’t listen to the commentary over “Objects In Space,” whatever you do. It annoyed me for weeks and permanently damaged my high opinion of Whedon.

Anyway, I’m off to rehearsal to see how much damage I can do to my voice before we open on Thursday. I’d put out a call for “break a leg”s, but the way I’m going I’m not sure that’s a great idea, even in jest!

Cheers,

Caryn

I’m back! (More or less)

oct2107.jpgSorry to vanish, but I’m still sick! Five days now of a complete lack of ability to breathe! Five days of phoning every sub on the list (and yes, I’ve had to resort to calling and saying, “Hi, I know this sounds strange, but I’m looking for whoever does substitute teaching at this number?” — that’s the cut off names on our list again).

Gotta give credit where it’s due, though — our principal seems to have a magic touch where subs are concerned. After three hours on the phone (spaced out over Wednesday night and Thursday afternoon) I finally called him and started babbling about sub lists and illnesses. He found me a sub for Friday, which was a huge weight off my mind, because I WANT MY VOICE BACK!!! I’m on stage in five days!!! This is NOT the time for laryngitis!

OK, I’m done with that now :) To make up for my prolonged absence, I’m uploading the new Halos a few hours early. Don’t tell anyone, kay?

Actually, I’m really pleased with the art in these next two comics. I’m proud of me! Yay!

Cheers!
Caryn

In No Other Profession Would This Happen

You know what really bugs me? When people talk about how little work teachers do and how much money we get. It goes beyond bugging me, actually. Now let me give you a little example of why.

I woke up sick yesterday, but because it was our division PD Day and I was leading a session, I had to go in. I suffered through the day, contacted a substitute, went to school last night and spent forty minutes writing a sub plan, came home, and collapsed. This morning at 11 am I got a phone call from a co-worker: my sub’s child had taken very ill and she had to rush out to get him. So I was left with a choice: start phoning or come in.

I spent the next half hour on the phone, at which point I realized that the sub list with which we’ve been provided goes beyond inadequate. Anyone whose last name is longer than five letters doesn’t have a first name appearing (and yes, it’s a little awkward to phone someone’s house and say hi, does anyone there teach?). Worse yet, if they have a cell phone number listed, both the home phones and cell numbers are cut off! Apparently someone looked at this thing and okayed it, which means they must not have looked very closely.

Anyway, half an hour later I phoned our school secretary and told her I couldn’t find anyone, so I’d come in. At this point the fact that I have an amazingly supportive staff kicked in: the secretary told me not to come because she could hear that I shouldn’t. The principal was away, so the unofficial VP asked his substitute to take over my class, allowing my original sub to go home to her child and me to stay in bed. Of course, that means everyone missed their gym classes because of me.

This is just one of those dumb things. It’s no one’s fault — how was my sub to know her child would suddenly take ill, or I to know that I’d need a second sub halfway through the day? It’s just one of the joys of teaching, though. If we hadn’t had someone to take over I just would have had to go in and no ifs ands buts about it, because someone needs to be there to supervise those kids. They can hardly let 21 eight year olds run amok because their teacher is out sick.

But still. Next time someone complains about how easy we teachers have it, I think I’m gonna slug them.
Cheers!
Caryn

Shut up, Brad

1191415656bradpittoceanscp.jpg

I’m sorry, but I just can’t let this pass without comment.

So Brad Pitt thinks religion is all about ego, does he? Brad Pitt. Brad-I’m-the-sexiest-man-alive-which-gives-me- the-right-to-do-whatever-I-darn-well-please-Pitt thinks religion is about ego.

Wow. Let’s have a look at what Brad says and see where he falls apart, shall we? All quotes are from the msn link above.

1. Brad told Parade magazine: “I didn’t understand this idea of a God who says, ‘You have to acknowledge me. You have to say that I’m the best, and then I’ll give you eternal happiness. It seemed to be about ego. I can’t see God operating from ego, so it made no sense to me.”

Okay, Brad. Obviously you weren’t paying attention in Sunday School there. I’d like you to find me the place where any church’s catechism, or the Bible for that matter, says that religion is some sort of bargain between man and God where man strokes God’s ego in exchange for eternal “happiness.” He’s right about one thing, though: that concept of religion makes no sense to me, either.

Religion isn’t a bargain. If anything, you could say it’s a bargain of faith: God says I’ll forgive you if you let me, and you say okay. Period. Of course in the long run we hope to find happiness, but I don’t think you can say any religion, let alone Christianity, is about finding happiness on earth. In fact, Christianity out and out promises that your life will be more difficult if you embrace it.

Sorry, Brad: I don’t think we’re talking about the same thing.

2. “When I got untethered from the comfort of religion, it wasn’t a loss of faith for me, it was a discovery of self.”

Untethered from the comfort of religion? I think you’ve got the makings of a writer there.

So on the one hand we have a God who demands everyone tell him he’s the best, and on the other we’ve got religion as a comfort. Not to mention how much I LOVE it when people ramble about the “discovery of self.” Apparently there was an arrogant atheist hiding inside all along!

3. The 43-year-old actor also revealed he finds it insulting that people think it was girlfriend Angelina Jolie who introduced him to charity work.

Brad – who founded his own organisation to rebuild homes for victims of the New Orleans disaster – said:

“I do it because I’m a member of the human race. In Africa you see people on the street dying from AIDS, children left without parents. We’re all cells of one body, with the same emotions and desires for our families – for a little dignity and a chance for a better life.”

We’re all cells of one body, huh? I wonder if he even realizes he stole that nearly word-for-word from the Bible.

Here’s a thought: if Brad Pitt is so altruistic, why not donate half his earnings to charity? I mean, think about how much the man makes. He could give away half easily and still have more than most people would know what to do with. I don’t want to minimize anyone’s efforts to help others — kudos to him for what he does do — but if you’re going to go on and on about “a chance for a better life,” it helps if you don’t do it from your Hollywood mansion.

And DON’T get me going on Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie. Why does everyone think these two are such a perfect couple? Have we forgotten that Pitt cheated on his wife with Jolie? Or are we conveniently overlooking that because “they’re so darn CUTE together?” Then again, maybe they are the perfect couple. They’re both attractive, talented people who figure those two traits make them better than the rest of humanity. And of course it doesn’t hurt that they’re rich.

3. “I believe in the founding principles of America. I want to fight for that. I know most Americans feel the same way.”

I’m so glad Americans have Brad Pitt to tell them how they feel. How else would they know?

And I hate to tell you this, Brad, but America was founded on Christian principles. I guess that means you’re working from a basis of ego.

4. “Whoever said all men are born equal never left his own backyard. I see people everywhere without opportunity. I want to help level the playing field.”

Actually, the point of saying all men are born equal is that everyone deserves the same dignity and respect as everyone else. It’s the way we treat each other that takes away that God-given equality… but I don’t expect Brad Pitt to understand that. He has talent, charm, and wealth; he doesn’t need brains.

And if he really wants to level the playing field, I refer him back to my earlier suggestion. Half your wealth, Brad. Still leaves you with more than I’ll ever see, and think of all the good you could do. That would be leveling the field. Until then, don’t ramble on to me about how altruistic and charitable you are. Remember the story in the Bible (except that’s all about ego!) where the woman gives her last silver coin and is held higher in the eyes of Heaven than the rich man who gave ten times that much? Or the bit about how people who do good works just to receive earthly praise aren’t acting from altruism but pride?

Hmm… come to think of it, maybe Pitt’s aversion to religion makes sense after all.

Cheers,
Caryn

« Older entries